In the last year many prominent voices have raised alarms about deficiencies in patient safety, just as staffing shortages have heightening concerns about harm due to inadequate care.
Here are five key points that have emerged.
1. Measures of patient safety worsened during the pandemic.
Rates of some hospital-associated infections tracked by the CDC increased in 2020 and 2021 following several years of improvement. Data show that falls and bed sores also increased.
Not surprisingly, some hospitals saw their safety scores slip. Patients reported that critical aspects of care such as transitioning out of the hospital, communication about medications, and hospital staff responsiveness — which are among the measures in the Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade — declined.
2. Patient safety wasn’t so great even before the pandemic.
Three recent studies using different methodologies suggest limited progress had been made in preventing patient harms pre-COVID-19.
- An estimated 13% of Medicare patients who were hospitalized in October 2018 experienced harm because of substandard care, according to a review of medical records of 770 patients by the HHS Office of the Inspector General (OIG). According to the OIG, the findings reflect little change from a similar analysis a decade earlier and show that federal tracking doesn’t capture most safety events.
- A review of 2,809 random admissions at Massachusetts hospitals in 2018 found that 7% resulted in a preventable adverse event.
- A study of nearly 250,000 hospitalizations at more than 3000 hospitals by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality found statistically significant declines in adverse events from 2012 to 2019 for heart attacks, pneumonia, heart failure and major surgeries. However, progress did not carry over to other conditions that were not the focus of quality improvement efforts, one of the investigators, Harlan Krumholtz, M.D., of Yale University and the Yale New Haven Hospital, told MedPage Today.
3. Policy changes might be coming.
Patient safety got a boost in the fall when the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) convened a public meeting with forward-thinking experts, whose suggestions included mandatory reporting of harms, greater patient engagement, unifying federal oversight of patient safety and collecting more meaningful data. A working group was charged with making specific policy recommendations to the Biden administration.
Meanwhile, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra launched a new project called the National Healthcare System Action Alliance to Advance Patient Safety. However, as consultant and former journalist Michael Millenson wrote in Forbes, it’s unclear what this public-private partnership will achieve. The public has until Jan. 26 to submit comments.
Finally, U.S. Rep. Nanette Diaz Barragán of California introduced legislation to create a National Patient Safety Board that would establish a voluntary reporting system for safety events and try to determine why they occur.
4. Health systems and patient advocates differ starkly on priorities.
At an HHS listening session in November, executives from about 20 large health care systems were asked to provide input on what they need from the federal government to improve safety. The prevailing responses were assistance with addressing staffing shortages and easing of reporting requirements. In contrast, three patient advocates who were invited to speak pleaded for policies to hold hospitals accountable such as greater transparency.
5. Patient safety will be the focus of a session at Health Journalism 2023 on Friday, March 10, in St. Louis.
A panel of experts will discuss what it will take to turbocharge patient safety reform and give journalists fresh ideas for covering the topic. The panel will include Martin Hatlie, CEO of Project Patient Care; Ruth Ann Dorrill, HHS regional inspector general; and Tejal Gandhi, M.D., M.P.H., chief safety and transformation officer at PressGaney. It’s not too late to register.